tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post5026856705787334745..comments2024-01-19T00:36:46.728-07:00Comments on Gene Cuisine: Human DNA similarities to chimps and bananas, what does it mean?Michael Mussohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10030622702187630543noreply@blogger.comBlogger100125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-7549659033859358712018-03-31T15:34:32.779-06:002018-03-31T15:34:32.779-06:00I visit this site and found this site really fruit...I visit this site and found this site really fruitful containing vital information. i also recommend this informative site to others and also for daily latest urdu news recommend.<a href="http://urdumax.com/" rel="nofollow">world news in urdu </a><br /> is also a beautiful urdu sharing linkFaisal Shahzadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15741661367216245082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-52353752617532630442017-11-27T14:11:56.259-07:002017-11-27T14:11:56.259-07:00If I needed to talk to someone who thought like th...If I needed to talk to someone who thought like that then there are plenty of asylums and retards right hereAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-65112222726445856202017-10-21T17:05:17.808-06:002017-10-21T17:05:17.808-06:00Why would anyone be surprised humans and chimps sh...Why would anyone be surprised humans and chimps share so much DNA, when we are so alike?<br /><br />It would be more surprising if we didn't share so many similarity, as clearly we should since we are so similar, proven by the pre-NDA era views on our similarity. <br /><br />The idea that this proves evolution is similar to the puddle thinking falacy that evolutionists argue against. Just as the conditions of the universe had to be right, so did the genes need to be so similar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-4811987889441130642017-10-21T16:57:24.419-06:002017-10-21T16:57:24.419-06:00^ The most emotionally unbalanced and cruel post i...^ The most emotionally unbalanced and cruel post in this thread. Ironic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-11195199320126855642017-08-17T18:30:20.398-06:002017-08-17T18:30:20.398-06:00That's the biggest load of jumbled up, unconne...That's the biggest load of jumbled up, unconnected, illogical supposition and nonsense that I have read in awhile - you either ignored your education or went to a strong faith school - either way, you've sadly wasted your brain!! Christian Fail!!https://www.blogger.com/profile/13956619043039040779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-18869973267136285252017-08-17T18:21:32.276-06:002017-08-17T18:21:32.276-06:00Even though this is an old comments section, i sti...Even though this is an old comments section, i still had to say how funny all the dumb ass religious idiots have been to read!! Some of the deluded and illogical nonsense they believe in is hilarious, and is it me or do Christian's defending their stupid beliefs sound alot like Flat Earthers & Illuminati freaks do??! Very similar mindset in my opinion, and delusional stupidity seems to be a prerequisite for belief in both religion and conspiracy theories!!<br /><br />I'm quite happy to say screw all the numbskulls who believe in god - I hope you burn in your totally non-existent hell: you deserve to for all the pain, bigotry, death & suffering that all religions have brought to this earth. To hell with religious tolerance - people who believe in the god are idiots and an insult to my intelligence.Christian Fail!!https://www.blogger.com/profile/13956619043039040779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-50737936526468237102016-11-28T12:42:42.121-07:002016-11-28T12:42:42.121-07:00samesameNeko Perdomohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17599338248104214354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-16757206397905712972016-11-28T12:41:02.816-07:002016-11-28T12:41:02.816-07:00The answer is similar to why human siblings exist ...The answer is similar to why human siblings exist separately and individually from each other. Each sibling may be different, but they can each survive and create different families.<br />Monkeys and bananas lead different existences than humans, but all of us manage to survive in our own diverse ways.Neko Perdomohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17599338248104214354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-43811509247101398902016-11-23T19:33:10.399-07:002016-11-23T19:33:10.399-07:00"like they witnessed or actually managed to e..."like they witnessed or actually managed to evolve anything in terms of speciation."<br /><br />Species are taxonomic classifications. They're not the end of evolution. Organisms become more specific than species, and the lines diverge further from there. <br /><br />"Is natural selection an entity? Sounds like it "chooses" which animal must die out or does it choose which is allowed to live?"<br /><br />It's just environmental pressure, and a description of how organisms who aren't fit (can't reproduce and have offspring that survive to the point where they reproduce) have genetic lines that die out. It's not conscious.<br /><br />"And how many years does it give for a species to die?"<br /><br />Natural selection can happen in hours. Phenomena like floods are part of natural selection. So is competition for food sources.<br /><br />"If it cant survive in an environment why/how did it evolve to do so initially?"<br /><br />You're making the mistake of thinking this happens in individuals, and not populations. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-2572053121209883232016-11-11T11:41:08.606-07:002016-11-11T11:41:08.606-07:00Read this all. Why do ppl state thier "belief...Read this all. Why do ppl state thier "beliefs" with so much assertion? like they witnessed or actually managed to evolve anything in terms of speciation. Forget micro evolution. Is natural selection an entity? Sounds like it "chooses" which animal must die out or does it choose which is allowed to live? And how many years does it give for a species to die? If it cant survive in an environment why/how did it evolve to do so initially? <br /><br />So.many questions but the answers will b nothing more than, this is the belief we hold told to us by our priests(scientists) so we will make a link through some proven facts and hope later on we can prove what we dont know or have no answer to right now. But lets laugh at ppl who do the same but with a different origin/angle<br /><br />LoolLets think differenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00111418611070983142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-52097793829987213002016-11-11T11:39:42.457-07:002016-11-11T11:39:42.457-07:00Read this all. Why do ppl state thier "belie...Read this all. Why do ppl state thier "beliefs" with so much assertion? like they witnessed or actually managed to evolve anything in terms of speciation. Forget micro evolution. Is natural selection an entity? Sounds like it "chooses" which animal must die out or does it choose which is allowed to live? And how many years does it give for a species to die? If it cant survive in an environment why/how did it evolve to do so initially? <br /><br />So.many questions but the answers will b nothing more than, this is the belief we hold told to us by our priests(scientists) so we will make a link through some proven facts and hope later on we can prove what we dont know or have no answer to right now. But lets laugh at ppl who do the same but with a different origin/angle<br /><br />LoolLets think differenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00111418611070983142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-17447949541668806892016-10-14T04:51:09.546-06:002016-10-14T04:51:09.546-06:00If we evolved from a common ancestor of monkeys, w...If we evolved from a common ancestor of monkeys, why are are there still monkeys? We evolved from an older common ancestor of the banana. So why are there bananas?<br />RossLucanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02801154661413595632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-16449523000195885912016-09-29T12:02:18.906-06:002016-09-29T12:02:18.906-06:00First of all, our DNA has been most affected by th...First of all, our DNA has been most affected by the foods we have eaten over time, especially the ANIMAL meat we have consumed! SO if herbivores consumed certain foods, I'm sure their DNA was altered BY those foods, just as OUR ancestral and present diets have affected our present DNA/Human Genome, and so it is MUCH MORE LIKELY that FOODS we ate have more to do with WHY we have DNA in common with them than the fish tale and fairy story that we somehow "Evolved" from earlier species. Besides, there is no way the earth is credibly older than 25,000 years old, even if you factor in a bunch of other things. Most likely it is around 13,000 years old, and humans have been around for about 9000 of those years, and most likely we did NOT evolve from other things, but were created or placed here by an alien species of some sort, because honestly, we started record keeping about 5500 years ago, that WE KNOW OF, as the other forms may have degraded long before it became important that we preserve them, and certainly, the types of products we were using to keep those records may have taken some experimentation with to determine the best way to do that, as experience is the best teacher, so while record-keeping showed up 5500 years ago, credibly, it has probably existed for much, much longer than that, only to be lost due to natural causes. ALSO, thanks to space research, we know that without the atmosphere, there's no way on earth we could have any of this "stuff" we have, and without plants, and certainly plants without animals CAN NOT SURVIVE and maintain the atmosphere that we have, so the theory that we "descended" or "evolved" over millions or billions of years is nothing but a Fish Tale and Fairy Story, told with Stoic Self Confidence which has NO credibility nor proof whatsoever. DNA has a half-life of 521 years. Gosh, wait a few thousand years and you'll believe humans evolved from RICE if you base it on "common DNA" as a "credible proof" that we "evolved". If, for instance, 5500 years ago, we actually "started" keeping records, which is HIGHLY DOUBTFUL, and only this relatively SHORT period of time later, here we are, then, technically, "Human Evolution" is actually FAR FAR FAR MORE ACCELERATED than you are suggesting, and THERE IS NO WAY ON EARTH it took that long WHATSOEVER for "Evolution" to play a part in ANY part of human development, to say the least. And as for having "common genes" to suggest we all originated from an original species that plants and animals ALSO came from, well, that's STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CONCEDE. You may as well sit down and see the Native American stories of creation, any religious accounting of it, or just about ANYTHING you or I could come up with right now from our imaginations, as just about AS CREDIBLE as suggesting Evolution is a PLAUSIBLE concept...Tamara Husseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10274054119708847954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-76772919423118394292016-09-07T14:48:20.513-06:002016-09-07T14:48:20.513-06:00Makes u wonder if ancient bananas had a higher dos...Makes u wonder if ancient bananas had a higher dose of radiation changin cells compared to bananas we have todayAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06391962068442801334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-85472256671768769192016-07-21T05:34:37.133-06:002016-07-21T05:34:37.133-06:00Then God made us with a sense of humour then?Then God made us with a sense of humour then?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-90883097104937288752016-07-21T05:32:13.089-06:002016-07-21T05:32:13.089-06:00All things are conected through nature - which we ...All things are conected through nature - which we are part of. All from same building blocks. Not very likely that an alien life form decided to make all this trash up, spin it about and then leave it alone unless this said alien has got bored with this toy and gone off somewhere else... Humans love to think we're important, but we aren't, just half a banana.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-38626622789966662652016-07-10T13:22:00.594-06:002016-07-10T13:22:00.594-06:00To what should I attribute my finding of this fasc...To what should I attribute my finding of this fascinating site?Not hybridization, not natural selection. Random access? Act of God? I'm not a scientist, not a theologian. I just wanted to find out how we could be 50% bananas! I will venture to say that Darwin (or A R Wallace)had a theory on the evolution of species. But he did not put forth a theory on the origin of life itself. Sometimes it seems the posters here were confusing the two issues. It is interesting to read what theories and defenses of those theories people come up with. Let us hope that some practical use can be made of them--like the curing of cancer, or anticipating the appearance of some new deadly virus. I am left with some questions I never thought of before--such as how could the animate originate from the inanimate? So Darwin's theory is interesting, but it doesn't really answer those Ultimate questions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-705271665418413072016-06-27T01:13:43.115-06:002016-06-27T01:13:43.115-06:00What a great thread...Loved the puns and humour in...What a great thread...Loved the puns and humour in some of the replies...With the sticky DNA as part of pathogen response of some root systems like banana and tomato plants coming to light, I wonder if we share some of our immune response with them and if this has any pointers to drug discovery in these areas...Shobhahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15908727141754393801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-73345695473262346922016-01-25T17:22:50.965-07:002016-01-25T17:22:50.965-07:00Some say Noah's ark may have been a metaphor f...Some say Noah's ark may have been a metaphor for aliens and/or people leaving the earth on a spaceship. They didn't have literal animals but just DNA samples. Kind of like if we are to realistically repopulate another planet a handful of scientists would go with many DNA samples for diversification.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04400453070925002201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-19386515913922394012016-01-25T17:20:57.662-07:002016-01-25T17:20:57.662-07:00Some say Noah's ark may have been a metaphor f...Some say Noah's ark may have been a metaphor for aliens and/or people leaving the earth on a spaceship. They didn't have literal animals but just DNA samples. Kind of like if we are to realistically repopulate another planet a handful of scientists would go with many DNA samples for diversification.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04400453070925002201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-37604322450793251252015-11-22T02:24:35.403-07:002015-11-22T02:24:35.403-07:00When was the last time you saw a good project mana...When was the last time you saw a good project manager doing all the work by himself? God would not have created the entire world. He just set some rules and decisions, dumped it somewhere and created a world that creates itself. Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09151698936413220127noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-90485895559177254912015-09-17T14:41:47.559-06:002015-09-17T14:41:47.559-06:00Alfred Russel Wallace, he was the original worker ...Alfred Russel Wallace, he was the original worker on the evolution theory, yeah Darwin was also researching at the same time, but ARW is the true theorist, he just had less air time so to speakAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-59999112632950436182015-09-05T21:56:53.184-06:002015-09-05T21:56:53.184-06:00How very improper of all of you. If a person who b...How very improper of all of you. If a person who believes in a creator presents there theory to oppose your theory, who then is the smarter of the pair? You may not agree with their views, however, they are endeavoring to learn the truth in both sides, whilst you choose to mock their efforts to understand a common ground. You who make reference to a study that cannot be proven given the knowledge of the limitations of science, are almost undoubtedly clueless concerning the proverbial "flip side" to your own beliefs. But I now have an intestine view of possible reasons for the genetic connections. Thank you first person in this section. And I apologize for the delay in seeing this unfortunate realm of ignorance. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-1768391677822773002015-04-23T05:32:01.406-06:002015-04-23T05:32:01.406-06:00Trying to say that a god exists because the bible ...Trying to say that a god exists because the bible says so is illogical.<br />After all, who guarantees the bible is accurate about the existence of a god?<br />If you were going to say the supposed god guarantees it, you just commited a circular logic, which is a logical fallacy.<br />" Please, honorable judge, Kevin will vouch for me! "<br />" Who, then, vouches for Kevin? "<br />" Well, honorable judge, I do, and you know that Kevin vouches for me."<br />That is what you are trying to do just nowAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981168850897422926.post-49551286996014440672015-04-23T05:24:00.268-06:002015-04-23T05:24:00.268-06:00How does the speed at which the celestial bodies a...How does the speed at which the celestial bodies are moving affect the scientific correctness of evolution?<br />Red Herring, if you ask meAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com